Friday, November 9, 2007

Mr Johnson, Imortal perhaps, but not invicble!


The conviction in the episode of CSI was of hardly any forensic evedince beside imprints on the victims body of a girl who got run over, by the grandson of a guy who reported his car missing. They way they took the prints off the body was in a unsecure rooom wich could of been tampered with. So therefore the conclusions they gave the accused in the negotiation rooms were il constructed and perhaps illiegal.

Stripping for a Grandma with a Chainsaw ERRR ERRR

In this weeks episode a stripper comes and strips for a womans bachorlette party, but to his surprise he is murdered from rage of over jealous husband. The way the CSI team set this up was a accurate measure. Even though they had the vaginal cells of a woman, they didnt test the four girls who were their. I am challenging that a person/the csi team can, should, tested to see who matched the vaginal cells on the dead stripper to see who had sex with him so they can verify there testomonies to be true or not.

Thursday, November 8, 2007

The chainsaw grandma and the stripper who didn't get lucky WORD SCRAMBLE


1. TIRPEPSR

2. DIGNWDE

3. ACHBELROTETE

4. HIANC WAS

5. TEPIET GARNMAD

6. NOEBS

7. NMA KENAD

8. EOLV
9. BUICC IZCRONUMI
10. IMOANDD

Friday, November 2, 2007

Aww, here we go again. Tough Dying Word Scramble!

1. OTO GHOUT OT IED

2. LEBT OPOL

3. UNG HLOES

4. IMOTSETESI

5. FELS FEDNESE

6. LUBTLES

7. CSRWE VIDRRE

8. BUVIESA BUSHADN

9. CONSED OWND YAPMENT

Dying Toughly


It seems every week the csi team performs recreation of the crime scene or part of it and every time there experiments lead to have outside variables that could or could not affect the procedures of there reenactment. In this weeks episode they shoot a tshirt from different distances to see what kind of marks it makes and to see how far the shooter was from the victim to prove the witnesses and shooters testimonies right or wrong. To make the gun stable they used a balnce to rest the shaft of the gun on top. But this was a mistake for they still had a person hold the gun shooting it slightly downward or upward. Thus creating an extra length of distance for we all know a straight line compared to a diagnloled line ended up in the same place is always shorter. Also it could effect how the bullet penatrated the shirt leaving inconclusive responce on where the gun powder landed on the shirt. I thinik its easy to say that this myth has been Bussssted!!!! i mean the csi team screwed up again.